From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc5] PCI: sort device lists breadth-first
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 12:11:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060909121134.GC4277@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <450283D5.1020404@garzik.org>
Hi!
> I wanted to note what Martin Mares just raised in the
> thread "State of the Linux PCI Subsystem for 2.6.18-rc6":
>
> >Changing the device order in the middle of the 2.6
> >cycle doesn't sound
> >like a sane idea to me. Many people have changed their
> >systems' configuration
> >to adapt to the 2.6 ordering and this patch would break
> >their setups.
> >I have seen many such examples in my vicinity.
> >
> >I believe that not breaking existing 2.6 setups is much
> >more important
> >than keeping compatibility with 2.4 kernels, especially
> >when the problem
> >is discovered after more than 2 years after release of
> >the first 2.6.
>
>
> I'm not siding with either Martin or Matt explicitly,
> just noting that there are good arguments for both sides.
I agree with martin here. 'Lets break all the machines where people
are currently using 2.6.x, for benefit of people currently running
2.4.x' is *very* bad idea.
Pavel
--
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-10 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-08 3:14 [PATCH 2.6.18-rc5] PCI: sort device lists breadth-first Matt Domsch
2006-09-08 15:56 ` Dave Jones
2006-09-08 16:18 ` Matt Domsch
2006-09-08 16:55 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-09-11 19:36 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-09-12 3:08 ` Matt Domsch
2006-09-12 21:06 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-09-08 16:45 ` Greg KH
2006-09-08 18:20 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-08 18:52 ` Matt Domsch
2006-09-08 18:59 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2006-09-09 9:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-09 12:11 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2006-09-10 11:26 ` Stefan Richter
2006-09-10 13:02 ` Greg KH
2006-09-15 3:53 ` Dan Carpenter
2006-09-15 13:02 ` Matt Domsch
2006-09-16 2:39 ` Dan Carpenter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-08 3:18 Matt Domsch
2006-09-08 19:34 Matt Domsch
2006-09-09 14:37 Ragnar Kjørstad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060909121134.GC4277@ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=Matt_Domsch@dell.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.