From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [202.173.155.195] (helo=birgitte.twibble.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1GMFDC-0000Fn-5J for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 04:38:22 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by birgitte.twibble.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D7A8A525 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:35:09 +1000 (EST) Received: from birgitte.twibble.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (birgitte [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14609-05 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:35:07 +1000 (EST) Received: from nynaeve.twibble.org (nynaeve.twibble.org [202.173.155.194]) by birgitte.twibble.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A328A524 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:35:07 +1000 (EST) Received: by nynaeve.twibble.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id B9763FD743F; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:35:07 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:35:07 +1000 From: Jamie Lenehan To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20060910023507.GA25398@twibble.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jamie Lenehan , openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <200609062324.33029.christopher.lang@plus.cablesurf.de> <20060909025533.GA4524@twibble.org> <45027F94.5080705@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <45027F94.5080705@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd at twibble.org Subject: Re: error: #error "TLS support is required." while building glibc-initial-2.4 on x86_64 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list Reply-To: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Linux Distributions List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Linux Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 02:38:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 10:47:16AM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: [...] > > I've added make 3.81 to OE (by copying all the 3.80 releated make > > files to 3.81 versions - no changes necessary) and then do a "bitbake > > make-native" prior to building rather than update the host version of > > make. > > Are there any nasty side-effects of update to 3.81? If not, could you commit it? Not that I've seen. I've been doing builds for i486 (WRAP boards) and i586 (EPIA) with make 3.81 without any problems, although I don't build any UI stuff. I believe some newer distros are also shipping make 3.81 as the default. In this case make-native isn't actually built unless you explicitly ask for it and make would be used on the target not by OE. So I don't see any issues with pushing this version. I'll do that now. -- Jamie Lenehan