From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>,
akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org, sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org,
jeff@garzik.org, bjorn.helgaas@hp.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, harmon@ksu.edu,
len.brown@intel.com, vsu@altlinux.ru, liste@jordet.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 21:37:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060910043741.GA21327@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060910003922.GA8147@tuatara.stupidest.org>
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 05:39:22PM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 05:21:12PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > So why isn't acpi handling all of this for us?
>
> for some people it does...
>
> > Do people not want to use acpi for some reason?
>
> I was told that in the past VIA has buggy/broken ACPI, so we need to
> figure out what ACPI workaround Windows has and implement that (or
> maybe they do it in the driver(s)?)
Then that sounds like an ACPI issue, instead of trying to create a quirk
for the pci device itself.
Why not enable ACPI (which the manufacturer says is the way to go), and
then work from there?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-10 4:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-07 22:33 [PATCH V3] VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change Daniel Drake
2006-09-09 14:20 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-09 14:44 ` Daniel Drake
2006-09-09 16:03 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-09 21:34 ` Daniel Drake
2006-09-10 0:31 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-10 0:21 ` Greg KH
2006-09-10 0:39 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-09-10 4:37 ` Greg KH [this message]
2006-09-10 9:48 ` Stian Jordet
2006-09-10 15:48 ` Daniel Drake
2006-09-10 18:40 ` Lee Revell
2006-09-10 20:45 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-09-10 21:30 ` Lee Revell
2006-09-10 21:34 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-09-19 20:04 ` Lee Revell
2006-09-19 20:12 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-09-19 20:28 ` Lee Revell
2006-09-10 16:01 ` Daniel Drake
2006-09-10 16:39 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-10 16:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-10 19:06 ` Daniel Drake
2006-09-10 19:41 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-10 19:21 ` Stian Jordet
2006-09-11 15:33 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-09-11 20:16 ` Stian Jordet
2006-09-11 21:23 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-09-11 21:38 ` Stian Jordet
2006-09-12 12:37 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-09-12 21:38 ` Stian Jordet
2006-09-13 0:48 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-09-11 21:54 ` Daniel Drake
2006-09-12 6:21 ` Stian Jordet
2006-09-11 21:44 ` Daniel Drake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060910043741.GA21327@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=harmon@ksu.edu \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liste@jordet.net \
--cc=sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=vsu@altlinux.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.