All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix longstanding load balancing bug in the scheduler.
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:37:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060911083734.GA25953@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609091252070.26746@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 12:56:16PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> 
> > > one or more, it is unnecessary for the common case.
> > 
> > The common case is an arch with much less cpus. The maxinum on i386
> > f.e. is 255 meaning 8 bytes. That fits in the cacheline that is already
> > used for the stack frame of the calling function. 
> 
> Ughh. Wrong. 255 cpus require 32 bytes. System rarely have that 
> much. If you configure a kernel with less than 32 cpus then this will be 
> one word on the stack.
> 
> Also note that the patch restricts the search to online cpus. The 
> scheduler will check offline cpus without this patch. That may actually 
> result in speed improvements since the cachelines from offline cpus are
> no longer brought in during the search for the busiest group / cpu.

This should not be the case. The sched-domain structure should always
reflect the online CPUs only (see our hotplug cpu handler), and if you
find otherwise then that would be a bug.


  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-11  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-06 23:38 [PATCH] Fix longstanding load balancing bug in the scheduler Christoph Lameter
2006-09-07 10:58 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-07 15:29   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-07 17:24   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-07 21:47     ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-07 22:20       ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-07 22:32         ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-08  2:52           ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-08 17:35 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-09-08 18:40   ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-08 20:00     ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-09-08 20:19       ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-09  0:03         ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-09-09  5:25           ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-09 19:56             ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-11  8:37               ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2006-09-12 18:37                 ` [PATCH] Fix longstanding load balancing bug in the scheduler V2 Christoph Lameter
2006-09-15  0:26                   ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-15  9:44                     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060911083734.GA25953@wotan.suse.de \
    --to=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.