From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Jim Gettys <jg@laptop.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
ACPI ML <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Adam Belay <abelay@novell.com>,
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
devel@laptop.org
Subject: Re: [OLPC-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:21:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060912092143.GD19482@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1157555949.6011.516.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed 2006-09-06 11:19:09, Jim Gettys wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 12:37 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > 2.4 and 2.6 are *very* different here. You'll probably need to optimize freezer
> > > > in 2.6 a bit...
> > > >
> > >
> > > Among other problems: e.g. 2.4 did not automatically do a VT switch; 2.6
> > > does; we'll have to have a way to signal "we're a sane display driver;
> > > don't switch away from me on suspend".
> >
> > Not like that, please.
> >
> > You are using X running over framebuffer, right? So that kernel is
> > controlling the graphics hardware. In such case it is safe to avoid VT
> > switch.
>
> It should be perfectly safe.
Okay, but per-driver flag is wrong way to go (see the other mail).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-12 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-30 18:40 [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2006-08-30 19:43 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-08-31 23:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-08-31 23:27 ` [OLPC-devel] " Matthew Garrett
2006-09-01 0:30 ` Jim Gettys
2006-09-01 3:53 ` Len Brown
2006-09-01 4:12 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-09-01 15:51 ` Jordan Crouse
2006-09-01 13:14 ` [OLPC-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] " Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2006-09-01 21:52 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-01 22:57 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-04 13:13 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-04 13:09 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-05 14:31 ` Jim Gettys
2006-09-06 10:37 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-06 14:58 ` Jordan Crouse
2006-09-12 9:21 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-12 18:14 ` Jim Gettys
2006-09-12 18:27 ` Mitch Bradley
2006-09-12 20:18 ` Jordan Crouse
2006-09-14 9:20 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-14 9:18 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-14 11:29 ` Jim Gettys
2006-09-06 15:19 ` [OLPC-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] " Jim Gettys
2006-09-12 9:21 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060912092143.GD19482@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=abelay@novell.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=devel@laptop.org \
--cc=jg@laptop.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.