From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reporting file descriptors created by pipe and
	socketpair
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:41:55 -0400
Message-ID: <200609121341.55412.sgrubb@redhat.com>
References: <ogt8xkpgjbi.fsf@divan.mitre.org>
	<20060912162104.GK4144@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060912162104.GK4144@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Tuesday 12 September 2006 12:21, Alexander Viro wrote:
> c) just how do you propose to do "tracking file descriptors"? =A0It's
> so trivial to confuse that it's not even funny; pass an SCM_RIGHTS
> datagram to yourself and watch that code blow chunks.

So, what would be a good way to let them see the file descriptors created=
 by=20
these two syscalls? The can get the info for socket, open, accept, ...  b=
ut=20
these two are difficult to get at the information.

This might be better as an aux record instead of part of the syscall reco=
rd=20
where the field is meaningless for 99.99% of the syscalls.

-Steve