From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Per-cpu patches on top of PDA stuff... Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 09:00:17 +0200 Message-ID: <200609200900.17193.ak@muc.de> References: <1158635617.21726.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> <450FA6FB.9020100@goop.org> <1158710822.2480.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1158710822.2480.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: virtualization@lists.osdl.org Cc: Andrew Morton , James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, Ingo Molnar List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org > Seems that we can't assume boot CPU =3D=3D 0. I think I've removed the t= wo > places where I assumed that, but will need testing. boot CPU =3D=3D 0 should be true. You just can't assume anything about its APIC ID, but we decouple APIC ID and logical processor id anyways. Another issue is that with CPU hotunplug CPU #0 might disappear at some point later. -Andi