All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gitweb: Make git_get_refs_list do work of git_get_references
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:40:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200609210040.52886.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7veju6h0et.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jakub Narebski wrote:
>> +                     if (! $4) { # unpeeled, direct reference
>> +                             push @refs, { hash => $1, name => $3 }; # without type
>> +                     } elsif ($3 eq $refs[-1]{'name'}) {
>> +                             # most likely a tag is followed by its peeled
>> +                             # (deref) one, and when that happens we know the
>> +                             # previous one was of type 'tag'.
>> +                             $refs[-1]{'type'} = "tag";
>> +                     }
>>...
>> -     return \@reflist;
>> +     return (\@reflist, \%refs);
> 
> You are maintaining reflist (an array of hashrefs each element
> of which describes name, type, hash and other parse_ref()
> information for the ref) and refs (a hash that maps from name to
> hash) separatly.  I wonder if this really has the performance
> advantage over just compute and return reflist from here and
> have the callers who need the mapping to derive it from the list
> (i.e.
> 
>         my ($reflist) = git_get_refs_list();
>         my %refs = map { $_->{name} => $_->{hash} } @$reflist;
> ).

The %refs hash contain also map from peeled (dereferenced) object
to ref name. The information about derefs is not present in @reflist.
So the answer is that you can't derive %refs from @reflist. 
-- 
Jakub Narebski
ShadeHawk on #git
Poland

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-20 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-19 12:30 [PATCH 0/2] Make git_get_refs_list do work of git_get_references Jakub Narebski
2006-09-19 12:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] gitweb: Always use git-peek-remote in git_get_references Jakub Narebski
2006-09-20 16:09   ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-20 18:13     ` Jakub Narebski
2006-09-21  9:07       ` Andreas Ericsson
2006-09-19 12:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] gitweb: Make git_get_refs_list do work of git_get_references Jakub Narebski
2006-09-20 18:12   ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-20 22:40     ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2006-09-20 23:14       ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200609210040.52886.jnareb@gmail.com \
    --to=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=junkio@cox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.