From: linux@horizon.com
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux@horizon.com, neilb@suse.de
Subject: Re: Interesting RAID checking observations
Date: 21 Sep 2006 02:58:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060921065808.19682.qmail@science.horizon.com> (raw)
Just to follow up my speed observations last month on a 6x SATA <-> 3x
PCIe <-> AMD64 system, as of 2.6.18 final, RAID-10 checking is running
at a reasonable ~156 MB/s (which I presume means 312 MB/s of reads),
and raid5 is better than the 23 MB/s I complained about earlier, but
still a bit sluggish...
md5 : active raid5 sdf4[5] sde4[4] sdd4[3] sdc4[2] sdb4[1] sda4[0]
1719155200 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/6] [UUUUUU]
[=>...................] resync = 6.2% (21564928/343831040) finish=86.0min speed=62429K/sec
I'm not sure why the raid5 check can't run at 250 MB/s (300 MB/s disk
speed). The processor is idle and can do a lot more than that:
raid5: automatically using best checksumming function: generic_sse
generic_sse: 6769.000 MB/sec
raid5: using function: generic_sse (6769.000 MB/sec)
But anyway, it's better, so thank you! I haven't rebooted the celeron
I hung for the duration of a RAID-1 check, so I haven't checked that with
2.6.18 yet.
next reply other threads:[~2006-09-21 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-21 6:58 linux [this message]
2006-09-21 18:48 ` Interesting RAID checking observations linux
2006-09-21 18:55 ` Rob Bray
2006-09-22 2:13 ` linux
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-27 6:46 linux
2006-08-27 11:18 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-08-28 13:00 ` linux
2006-08-28 1:04 ` Neil Brown
2006-08-28 13:15 ` linux
2006-09-04 17:16 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-09-04 21:15 ` linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060921065808.19682.qmail@science.horizon.com \
--to=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.