From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: "Langsdorf, Mark" <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>
Cc: Cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, nemesis@icequake.net
Subject: Re: writing a cpufreq driver
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:47:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060921194714.GH17065@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449F58C868D8D4E9C72945771150BDF153669@SAUSEXMB1.amd.com>
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:38:22PM -0500, Langsdorf, Mark wrote:
> > > 1. The first time cpufreq changes speed, I get the whole
> > "Losing some
> > > ticks... checking if CPU frequency changed." then
> > eventually "Losing too
> > > many ticks!" and timer switches to PIT. This does not
> > happen when I use
> > > the /dev/toshiba driver to change speeds from userspace.
> > Not sure what
> > > is going on here... SMI handler latency is between 6 and 7 ms.
> >
> > Is loops_per_jiffy being correctly scaled on a speed transition?
> > Hmm, powernow-k7.c seems to be the only driver that's calling
> > recalibrate_cpu_khz()
>
> Do drivers need to be doing that? I would have thought the
> time could would do it after receiving the notification.
Looking at it again..
cpufreq_notify_transition() is calling adjust_jiffies()
which should be doing the same thing, so we should be good to go.
It looks like feasible that recalibrate_cpu_khz() could actually
be killed off.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-21 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-21 18:48 writing a cpufreq driver Ryan Underwood
2006-09-21 19:31 ` Dave Jones
2006-09-21 19:38 ` Langsdorf, Mark
2006-09-21 19:47 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2006-09-22 15:44 ` Bruno Ducrot
2006-09-22 15:49 ` Dave Jones
2006-09-21 20:08 ` Ryan Underwood
2006-09-21 20:44 ` Dave Jones
2006-09-21 21:03 ` Ryan Underwood
2006-09-21 21:13 ` Dave Jones
2006-09-22 14:13 ` Ryan Underwood
2006-09-22 14:39 ` Ryan Underwood
2006-09-22 15:48 ` Bruno Ducrot
2006-09-22 16:01 ` Ryan Underwood
2006-09-22 15:51 ` Dave Jones
2006-09-22 15:39 ` Bruno Ducrot
2006-09-22 16:00 ` Ryan Underwood
2006-09-22 16:05 ` Bruno Ducrot
2006-09-22 16:11 ` Ryan Underwood
2006-09-23 15:07 ` Bruno Ducrot
2006-09-23 15:21 ` Ryan Underwood
2006-09-23 15:44 ` Bruno Ducrot
2006-09-23 16:03 ` Ryan Underwood
2006-09-23 16:13 ` Bruno Ducrot
2006-09-25 15:39 ` Ryan Underwood
2006-10-02 2:19 ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-09-25 16:44 ` Ryan Underwood
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-22 16:31 Erik Slagter
2006-09-23 15:31 ` Bruno Ducrot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060921194714.GH17065@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=Cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.langsdorf@amd.com \
--cc=nemesis@icequake.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.