From: Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.16.30-pre1
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:46:47 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060924114647.a0e4a650.vsu@altlinux.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060923235315.GB24214@1wt.eu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1317 bytes --]
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 01:53:15 +0200 Willy Tarreau wrote:
> The problem is when some hardware suddenly become detected and assigned
> in the middle of a stable release. Do not forget that people need stable
> releases to be able to blindly update and get their security vulnerabilities
> fixed. Sometimes, unlocking 2 SATA ports on the mobo by adding a PCI ID or
> adding the PCI ID of some new ethernet cards that were not supported may
> lead to such fun things (eth0 becoming eth2, sda becoming sdc, etc...).
> This causes real trouble to admins, particularly those doing remote
> updates. At least, I think that if you manage to inform people clearly
> enough, and to separate security fixes and such fixes in distinct releases,
> it might work in most situations. But this is a dangerous game anyway.
Seems that the V4L/DVB patches in question are safe in this regard.
These patches add PCI table entries matching the specific subsystem ids;
without these entries the device will still match the default entry for
the chip, and the user will get the same /dev/videoN, but most likely it
won't work correctly.
The only problem which might arise is with additional IR input devices,
but no one should expect any stable ordering there - with USB the order
of input devices is already random.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-24 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-22 22:23 Linux 2.6.16.30-pre1 Adrian Bunk
2006-09-22 22:38 ` Greg KH
2006-09-22 22:47 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-22 23:09 ` Greg KH
2006-09-23 4:56 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-09-23 23:21 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-23 23:53 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-09-24 7:46 ` Sergey Vlasov [this message]
2006-09-24 18:16 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-24 19:46 ` Stefan Richter
2006-09-24 19:44 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-09-24 20:02 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-09-25 1:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-24 10:17 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-25 1:23 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-25 8:15 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-27 5:14 ` Greg KH
2006-09-23 20:49 ` Jean Delvare
2006-09-23 20:57 ` Lee Revell
2006-09-23 21:20 ` Jean Delvare
2006-09-23 22:47 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-23 22:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-23 22:47 ` Lee Revell
2006-09-23 22:58 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-23 22:12 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-24 10:12 ` Pavel Machek
2006-09-25 1:20 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-09-24 20:25 ` Grant Coady
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060924114647.a0e4a650.vsu@altlinux.ru \
--to=vsu@altlinux.ru \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.