From: rgammans@computer-surgery.co.uk
To: jblunck@suse.de, device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: dm-snapshot scalability - chained delta snapshots approach
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:40:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060927104035.GA4939@computer-surgery.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060927091700.GA6314@X40.redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1915 bytes --]
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 11:17:00AM +0200, Jan Blunck wrote:
> We discussed some of the ideas about snapshots here at the dm summit. The
> general ideas are as follows:
>
> - one exception store per origin device that is shared by all snapshots
> - don't keep the complete exception tables in memory all the time
> - limit kcopyd outstanding requests
[snip]
> target. The throughput issues should be addressed by only writing to one
> exception store. The memory issues should be addressed by the changes to the
I have a need fro a 'snapshot' type dm mode which has this
characterstic. Eg, it leavse to origin device completely untouch by any
changes.
I was thinking that I'd have to code it myself from scratch as I could
see any simple way of reuse the existing dm-snap code - especially since
in my case the origin device will always be a physical volume (ie hda).
However if I can make use of a new dm-exception-store and possibly
even contribute to it this would be better.
I was considering some sort of B or B+ -tree type arrangement as then
we can use the buffer-cache (I'm assuming something similiar still
exists after the bh -> bio rewrite but I 'm a lttle behind) to store
the commonly referenced exceptions, which should keep the memory
required by the tables down at times of high memory pressure.
> There are still ongoing discussions about the snapshot target. It would be
> nice if you have additional thoughts about this proposal. I guess it is
> similar to one of your prototypes.
Is this where those discussion are taking place if I want to help
and particpate?
TTFN
--
Roger. Home| http://www.sandman.uklinux.net/
Master of Peng Shui. (Ancient oriental art of Penguin Arranging)
Work|Independent Sys Consultant | http://www.computer-surgery.co.uk/
New key Fpr: 1227 ABB1 7545 77A7 6816 2D18 4EBC AA9B 8EE3 1DD3
[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-27 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <44DA246B020000B60000BD22@lucius.provo.novell.com>
[not found] ` <44DB5BDD020000B60000BD96@lucius.provo.novell.com>
2006-08-10 10:46 ` snapshot scalability Haripriya S
2006-09-27 5:24 ` dm-snapshot scalability - chained delta snapshots approach Haripriya S
2006-09-27 9:17 ` Jan Blunck
2006-09-27 10:40 ` rgammans [this message]
2006-09-27 14:47 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-10-23 17:16 ` Molle Bestefich
2006-10-24 9:52 ` Jan Blunck
2006-10-25 12:09 ` Haripriya S
2006-10-26 8:29 ` Haripriya S
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060927104035.GA4939@computer-surgery.co.uk \
--to=rgammans@computer-surgery.co.uk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jblunck@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.