From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030859AbWI0VV3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:21:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030869AbWI0VV3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:21:29 -0400 Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:11795 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030859AbWI0VV2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:21:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:20:52 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Francois Romieu Cc: Martin Filip , Alistair John Strachan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: forcedeth - WOL Message-ID: <20060927212046.GA25022@tuxdriver.com> References: <1159379441.9024.7.camel@archon.smoula-in.net> <200609271935.12969.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> <1159388774.10054.1.camel@archon.smoula-in.net> <20060927204845.GA17803@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060927204845.GA17803@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 10:48:45PM +0200, Francois Romieu wrote: > Martin Filip : > [...] > > no.. I don't think it's my problem > > Is is similar to http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6398 ? Shot in the dark, but do either the cited bug or the one reported in this thread exhibit the "MAC address byte swapping" behavior to which forcedeth is prone? Just checkin'... John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com