From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: How to handle non-local renames? Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:54:48 +0100 Message-ID: <20060928115447.GC29920@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <1158597517.6297.10.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <1158883241.5535.7.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <20060928100223.GY29920@ftp.linux.org.uk> <20060928102748.GA29920@ftp.linux.org.uk> <20060928112142.GB29920@ftp.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, dhowells@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:19596 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751859AbWI1Lyt (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:54:49 -0400 To: Miklos Szeredi Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:44:01PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > I mostly see how that would work for lookup, but in case of rename the > d_move() is done by the VFS. So that seems to need surgery as well. See patches allowing to take it inside ->rename()...