All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
	sekharan@us.ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	nagar@watson.ibm.com, matthltc@us.ibm.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [RFC, PATCH 6/9] CPU Controller V2 - Handle dont care groups
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:02:02 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060928173202.GG8746@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060928172520.GA8746@in.ibm.com>

Deal with task-groups whose bandwidth hasnt been explicitly set by the
administrator. Unallocated CPU bandwidth is equally distributed among such
"don't care" groups.

Signed-off-by : Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>

---

 linux-2.6.18-root/include/linux/sched.h |    2 
 linux-2.6.18-root/kernel/sched.c        |   92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff -puN kernel/sched.c~cpu_ctlr_handle_dont_cares kernel/sched.c
--- linux-2.6.18/kernel/sched.c~cpu_ctlr_handle_dont_cares	2006-09-28 16:40:28.772666712 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.18-root/kernel/sched.c	2006-09-28 17:23:16.989238448 +0530
@@ -226,6 +226,12 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_grp_rq
 /* task-group object - maintains information about each task-group */
 struct task_grp {
 	unsigned short ticks, long_ticks; /* bandwidth given to task-group */
+ 	int left_over_pct;
+ 	int total_dont_care_grps;
+ 	int dont_care;          /* Does this group care for its bandwidth ? */
+ 	struct task_grp *parent;
+ 	struct list_head dont_care_list;
+ 	struct list_head list;
 	struct task_grp_rq *rq[NR_CPUS]; /* runqueue pointer for every cpu */
 };
 
@@ -7031,6 +7037,12 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
 
 	init_task_grp.ticks = CPU_CONTROL_SHORT_WINDOW;   /* 100% bandwidth */
 	init_task_grp.long_ticks = NUM_LONG_TICKS;
+ 	init_task_grp.left_over_pct = 100;  /* 100% unallocated bandwidth */
+ 	init_task_grp.parent = NULL;
+ 	init_task_grp.total_dont_care_grps = 1;	/* init_task_grp itself */
+ 	init_task_grp.dont_care = 1;
+ 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&init_task_grp.dont_care_list);
+	list_add_tail(&init_task_grp.list, &init_task_grp.dont_care_list);
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
 		struct rq *rq;
@@ -7195,8 +7207,31 @@ void set_curr_task(int cpu, struct task_
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPUMETER
 
+/* Distribute left over bandwidth equally to all "dont care" task groups */
+static void recalc_dontcare(struct task_grp *tg_root)
+{
+	int ticks;
+	struct list_head *entry;
+
+	if (!tg_root->total_dont_care_grps)
+		return;
+
+	ticks = ((tg_root->left_over_pct / tg_root->total_dont_care_grps) *
+		       				CPU_CONTROL_SHORT_WINDOW) / 100;
+
+	list_for_each(entry, &tg_root->dont_care_list) {
+		struct task_grp *tg;
+		int i;
+
+		tg = list_entry(entry, struct task_grp, list);
+		tg->ticks = ticks;
+		for_each_possible_cpu(i)
+			tg->rq[i]->ticks = tg->ticks;
+	}
+}
+
 /* Allocate runqueue structures for the new task-group */
-void *sched_alloc_group(void)
+void *sched_alloc_group(struct task_grp *tg_parent)
 {
 	struct task_grp *tg;
 	struct task_grp_rq *tgrq;
@@ -7208,6 +7243,10 @@ void *sched_alloc_group(void)
 
 	tg->ticks = CPU_CONTROL_SHORT_WINDOW;
 	tg->long_ticks = NUM_LONG_TICKS;
+	tg->parent = tg_parent;
+	tg->dont_care = 1;
+	tg->left_over_pct = 100;
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tg->dont_care_list);
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
 		tgrq = kzalloc(sizeof(*tgrq), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -7217,6 +7256,15 @@ void *sched_alloc_group(void)
 		task_grp_rq_init(tgrq, tg);
 	}
 
+	if (tg->parent) {
+		tg->parent->total_dont_care_grps++;
+		list_add_tail(&tg->list, &tg->parent->dont_care_list);
+		recalc_dontcare(tg->parent);
+	} else {
+		tg->total_dont_care_grps = 1;
+		list_add_tail(&tg->list, &tg->dont_care_list);
+	}
+
 	return tg;
 oom:
 	while (i--)
@@ -7230,6 +7278,16 @@ oom:
 void sched_dealloc_group(struct task_grp *tg)
 {
 	int i;
+	struct task_grp *tg_root = tg->parent;
+
+	if (!tg_root)
+		tg_root = tg;
+
+	if (tg->dont_care) {
+		tg_root->total_dont_care_grps--;
+		list_del(&tg->list);
+		recalc_dontcare(tg_root);
+	}
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(i)
 		kfree(tg->rq[i]);
@@ -7240,12 +7298,33 @@ void sched_dealloc_group(struct task_grp
 /* Assign quota to this group */
 int sched_assign_quota(struct task_grp *tg, int quota)
 {
-	int i;
+	int i, old_quota = 0;
+	struct task_grp *tg_root = tg->parent;
+
+	if (!tg_root)
+		tg_root = tg;
+
+	if (!tg->dont_care)
+		old_quota = (tg->ticks * 100) / CPU_CONTROL_SHORT_WINDOW;
+
+	if (quota > (tg_root->left_over_pct - old_quota))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (tg->dont_care) {
+		tg->dont_care = 0;
+		tg_root->total_dont_care_grps--;
+		list_del(&tg->list);
+	}
 
 	tg->ticks = (quota * CPU_CONTROL_SHORT_WINDOW) / 100;
+	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
+  		tg->rq[i]->ticks = tg->ticks;
+		tg->rq[i]->long_ticks = tg->long_ticks;
+	}
 
-	for_each_possible_cpu(i)
-		tg->rq[i]->ticks = tg->ticks;
+	/* xxx: needs some locking */
+	tg_root->left_over_pct -= (quota - old_quota);
+	recalc_dontcare(tg_root);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -7258,7 +7337,10 @@ static inline int cpu_quota(struct task_
 /* Return assigned quota for this group */
 int sched_get_quota(struct task_grp *tg)
 {
-	return cpu_quota(tg);
+	if (tg->dont_care)
+		return 0;
+	else
+		return cpu_quota(tg);
 }
 
 /*
diff -puN include/linux/sched.h~cpu_ctlr_handle_dont_cares include/linux/sched.h
--- linux-2.6.18/include/linux/sched.h~cpu_ctlr_handle_dont_cares	2006-09-28 16:40:28.777665952 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.18-root/include/linux/sched.h	2006-09-28 16:40:28.801662304 +0530
@@ -1615,7 +1615,7 @@ static inline int try_to_freeze(void) { 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPUMETER
 struct task_grp;
 struct task_grp_ops {
-	void *(*alloc_group)(void);
+	void *(*alloc_group)(struct task_grp *grp_parent);
 	void (*dealloc_group)(struct task_grp *grp);
 	int (*assign_quota)(struct task_grp *grp, int quota);
 	int (*pre_move_task)(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *,
_
-- 
Regards,
vatsa

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-09-28 17:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-28 17:25 [RFC, PATCH 0/9] CPU Controller V2 Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-09-28 17:27 ` [RFC, PATCH 1/9] CPU Controller V2 - Split runqueue Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-09-28 17:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 2/9] CPU Controller V2 - Task-group priority handling Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-09-28 17:28 ` [RFC, PATCH 3/9] CPU Controller V2 - group timeslice management Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-09-28 17:29 ` [RFC, PATCH 4/9] CPU Controller V2 - define group operations Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-09-28 17:30 ` [RFC, PATCH 5/9] CPU Controller V2 - deal with movement of tasks Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-09-28 17:32 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2006-09-28 17:32 ` [RFC, PATCH 7/9] CPU Controller V2 - SMP load balance changes Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-09-28 17:33 ` [RFC, PATCH 8/9] CPU Controller V2 - task_cpu(p) needs to be correct always Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-09-28 17:34 ` [RFC, PATCH 9/9] CPU Controller V2 - cpuset interface Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2006-09-29  3:28 ` [ckrm-tech] [RFC, PATCH 0/9] CPU Controller V2 Paul Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060928173202.GG8746@in.ibm.com \
    --to=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=dev@openvz.org \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nagar@watson.ibm.com \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.