From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [202.173.155.195] (helo=birgitte.twibble.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1GT3gJ-0005dJ-Nk for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:44:36 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by birgitte.twibble.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5572880105; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:39:32 +1000 (EST) Received: from birgitte.twibble.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (birgitte [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04456-03; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:39:30 +1000 (EST) Received: from nynaeve.twibble.org (nynaeve.twibble.org [202.173.155.194]) by birgitte.twibble.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E5C1E26D; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:39:30 +1000 (EST) Received: by nynaeve.twibble.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 5C73A10F2230; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:39:30 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:39:30 +1000 From: Jamie Lenehan To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20060928213929.GA6160@twibble.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jamie Lenehan , openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer References: <20060928132713.GA32288@twibble.org> <1159458235.6791.27.camel@gandalf.tm.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1159458235.6791.27.camel@gandalf.tm.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd at twibble.org Subject: Re: [oe-commits] org.oe.dev glibc 2.4: Apply recently added patches only fo x86. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list Reply-To: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Linux Distributions List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Linux Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:44:36 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:43:55PM +0200, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 28.09.2006, 23:27 +1000 schrieb Jamie Lenehan: > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:14:05PM +0200, "pfalcon commit" wrote: > > > glibc 2.4: Apply recently added patches only fo x86. > > > * Fixes breakage on ARM. > > > * Don't bump PR (previous commit neither did), to save long rebuilds. > > > Few people affected should use "bitbake glibc -c rebuild". > > > * Fixes #1443. > > > * Approved by Michael 'Mickey' Lauer . > > > > I've tested here and those two patches break glibc 2.4 for my main > > targets which are sh4 (titan), i486 (wrap) and i586 (epia), building > > on an x86_64 host. The breakage basically exactly the same as in > > #1443. > > > > I'm not sure what "x86" problem is that they are meant to fix (look > > like they are just wiring up syscalls to use in place of glibc equivs > > for the *at calls), but at least for me they actually break things on > > i486 and i586. > > 1. patch fixes problem: Right, but why are you seeing this issue when building for i486 and I'm not? That's important since these patches break my currently working builds. Hmm, maybe it's those new linux-libc-headers that I see went in a few days ago - they might now be exporting those *at functions when they weren't before and therefore glibc is now picking them up. I'm still using the 2.6.15.99 headers. I'll test with those newer ones now. -- Jamie Lenehan