From: khali@linux-fr.org (Jean Delvare)
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [lm-sensors] Answer Epox - EPoX EP1308 sensor-chip
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:50:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060929095047.acd76d50.khali@linux-fr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <450B14DB.2090505@sh.cvut.cz>
Hi Hans,
> Ran on Jean's advice sensors-detect again and it reported when probing for
> superior the following:
>
> Probing for Super-I/O at 0x4e/0x4f
> Trying family `ITE'... No
> Trying family `National Semiconductor'... No
> Trying family `SMSC'... No
> Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Fintek'... Yes
> Found unknown chip with ID 0x0541
Great, it partly worked. It properly detected the address (0x4e/0x4f)
and the family. Contrary to my expectations, it failed to find the
logical device number though, I wonder why.
> Then did an isadump on 0x4e 0x4f and was shown a lot more 0xff :(
> I looked at the driver code for the Fintek F71805F Super-I/O chip which uses
> 0x87 to as key to unlock.
Actually the key for this family is double 0x87. You are lucky that it
worked with only one (below), in most cases it won't.
> Results for isadump -k 0x87 0x4e 0x4f
> 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f
> 00: ff ff 00 ff ff ff ff 05 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> 10: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> 20: 05 41 10 19 34 00 00 7e 70 ff 44 a0 07 0a 00 00
^^^^^
This confirms my earlier guess that this chip was designed by Fintek,
despite the Epox top marking.
> 30: 01 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> 40: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> 50: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> 60: 00 60 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> 70: 01 ff 0c ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> 80: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> 90: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> a0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> b0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> c0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> d0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> e0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> f0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
Now I'd like to understand why sensors-detect didn't find the logical
device number. Please run the following command and provide the output
(assuming you use bash as your shell, and as root):
for ldn in `seq 0 15` ; do echo "=/ LDN=$ldn /=" ; isadump -y -k 0x87,0x87 0x4e 0x4f $ldn ; done
This will dump the first 16 logical devices (there are rarely more.) We
are looking for a logical device with 0x295 at 0x60. sensors-detect
would have detected that so I expect some trick though.
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-29 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-15 21:02 [lm-sensors] Answer Epox - EPoX EP1308 sensor-chip Rudolf Marek
2006-09-28 10:06 ` Hans Edgington
2006-09-28 16:21 ` Hans de Goede
2006-09-28 21:20 ` Rudolf Marek
2006-09-28 21:39 ` Jean Delvare
2006-09-28 21:43 ` Jean Delvare
2006-09-28 23:42 ` Hans Edgington
2006-09-29 7:37 ` Jean Delvare
2006-09-29 7:45 ` Hans de Goede
2006-09-29 7:50 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2006-09-29 8:03 ` Jean Delvare
2006-09-29 10:32 ` Hans Edgington
2006-09-29 11:27 ` Jean Delvare
2006-10-02 20:46 ` Hans Edgington
2006-10-04 12:08 ` Jean Delvare
2006-10-04 14:01 ` Hans de Goede
2006-10-04 14:43 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060929095047.acd76d50.khali@linux-fr.org \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.