From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GTIGe-0006lK-B5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:19:04 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GTIGa-0006il-QH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:19:03 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GTIGa-0006ii-LW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:19:00 -0400 Received: from [65.74.133.4] (helo=mail.codesourcery.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GTILu-0002iC-0e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:24:30 -0400 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-arm user mode does not work with ARM EABI Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:18:51 +0100 References: <56d259a00609261127u63a3154et4723f9ca089b7f31@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <56d259a00609261127u63a3154et4723f9ca089b7f31@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609291418.53967.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Martin Guy On Tuesday 26 September 2006 19:27, Martin Guy wrote: > Summary: > Ever since QEMU 0.8.1, qemu-arm-system mode works fine with ARM EABI > kernel and rootfs, but qemu-arm single-process mode is broken with > EABI, failing with "Unknown system call 0xf0005". > This is ARM private system call "set_tls", called from both the > linuxthreads and the NPTL pthread implementations in glibc-2.4, and > unimplemented in QEMU. > It is important that this mode work because scratchbox needs it to > be able to cross-compile Debian packages for the forthcoming > EABI-based Debian architecture. I've already answered this question three times in the last month... > Fixed for simple cases by pbrook's preliminary patches mentioned at > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2006-09/msg00194.html ... the answer is in that email. > These patches do not apply cleanly using "patch" (it can't find most > of the files to patch) The original patch applies fine with patch -p0. Paul