From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GU2zT-0008Fp-Sm for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 01 Oct 2006 08:12:28 -0700 Received: from [198.99.130.12] (helo=saraswathi.solana.com) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1GU2zS-0007H0-A6 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 01 Oct 2006 08:12:27 -0700 Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 11:11:11 -0400 From: Jeff Dike Message-ID: <20061001151111.GA3552@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <200609251834.k8PIYWLu005031@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <200610011649.08382.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200610011649.08382.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 3/8] UML - Fix missing x86_64 register definitions List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Blaisorblade Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 04:49:07PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > The patch is ok for me, but frankly, this hunk could be further cleaned up - > there is an awful hardcoded duplication of code which could be removed (the > definition could be split away from if inclusion order hell > starts). Yeah, these headers needs some serious cleanup. Jeff ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750892AbWJAPMc (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Oct 2006 11:12:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750866AbWJAPMc (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Oct 2006 11:12:32 -0400 Received: from [198.99.130.12] ([198.99.130.12]:41448 "EHLO saraswathi.solana.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750831AbWJAPMb (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Oct 2006 11:12:31 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 11:11:11 -0400 From: Jeff Dike To: Blaisorblade Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 3/8] UML - Fix missing x86_64 register definitions Message-ID: <20061001151111.GA3552@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <200609251834.k8PIYWLu005031@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <200610011649.08382.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200610011649.08382.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 04:49:07PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > The patch is ok for me, but frankly, this hunk could be further cleaned up - > there is an awful hardcoded duplication of code which could be removed (the > definition could be split away from if inclusion order hell > starts). Yeah, these headers needs some serious cleanup. Jeff