From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Holger Macht Subject: Re: powersaved is backwards on my machine... Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:10:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20061003140958.GA7087@homac> References: <20061002231848.GD9748@dominikbrodowski.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061002231848.GD9748@dominikbrodowski.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Erich Boleyn , cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk On Mon 02. Oct - 19:18:48, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 09:45:48AM -0700, Erich Boleyn wrote: > > So, I could not find any documentation on cpufreq that claimed the > > frequency states listed should be in any particular order, but maybe > > I was just not looking in the right place for the documentation... > > There's no such documentation that I'm aware of :) and I don't see why we > should enforce any particular order here. So I'd say fixing powernowd is the > right approach here. Ok, so I will fix powersaved to sort the values after reading them from scaling_avaialable_frequencies because I can't even assume that they are in any particular order, neither descending nor ascending. Regards, Holger