From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierrick Brossin Subject: Re: Building firmware on NetBSD Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:25:36 +0200 Message-ID: <20061003142534.GE16560@bs-network.net> References: <20061003141632.GD16560@bs-network.net> <907625E08839C4409CE5768403633E0B018E15BF@sefsexmb1.amd.com> Reply-To: Pierrick Brossin Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <907625E08839C4409CE5768403633E0B018E15BF@sefsexmb1.amd.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Petersson, Mats" Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 04:20:09PM +0200, Petersson, Mats wrote: > Depends on what you're doing, generally the modified will win - but in > some cases it's hard to get the source-code to modify [or find someone > that is ABLE to modify it for that matter]. What I mean is. In what way running an unmodified os with xen is better than running it directly in qemu ? Is it faster ? Is it completely different ? Thanks again for your time -Pierrick Brossin