From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Smith Subject: Re: PV drivers for HVM guests Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 11:24:48 +0100 Message-ID: <20061004102448.GA4547@cam.ac.uk> References: <45229025.E57C.0030.0@novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0672268700==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <45229025.E57C.0030.0@novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Mime-version: 1.0 Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ky Srinivasan Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, sos22@srcf.ucam.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============0672268700== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs" Content-Disposition: inline --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > These differences can be dealt with in a couple of different ways: > 1) Modify the code in the PV drivers under appropriate compilation > switches to deal with the differences in the base kernels. > 2) Introduce a compatibility component that bridges the gap between > the current PV code and a given Linux target and leave much of the > PV driver code untouched. How much code is actually required in this abstraction layer? Steven. --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFI4vwO4S8/gLNrjcRAnJzAJ45XwMovqGjHIpfNTOcOcdPmWv11ACePsZt gEATVMshTobo0UJfTyhfdk4= =MIKI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs-- --===============0672268700== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel --===============0672268700==--