All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Enable DEEPNAP power savings mode on 970MP
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:25:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200610052125.15305.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061004234141.749b13fb@localhost.localdomain>

On Thursday 05 October 2006 06:41, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Without this patch, on an idle system I get:
> 
> cpu-power-0:21.638
> cpu-power-1:27.102
> cpu-power-2:29.343
> cpu-power-3:25.784
> Total: 103.8W
> 
> With this patch:
> 
> cpu-power-0:11.730
> cpu-power-1:17.185
> cpu-power-2:18.547
> cpu-power-3:17.528
> Total: 65.0W
> 
> If I lower HZ to 100, I can get it as low as:
> 
> cpu-power-0:10.938
> cpu-power-1:16.021
> cpu-power-2:17.245
> cpu-power-3:16.145
> Total: 60.2W
> 
> Another (older) Quad G5 went from 54W to 39W at HZ=250.
> 
> Coming back out of Deep Nap takes 40-70 cycles longer than coming back
> from just Nap (which already takes quite a while). I don't think it'll
> be a performance issue (interrupt latency on an idle system), but in
> case someone does measurements feel free to report them.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>

Acked-by: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>

I am running DEEPNAP on my Quad since quite some time and I
did not see any problems.
It saves quite a bit of power (I think it was about 20W for me when
I measured it)
That's really worth it.

-- 
Greetings Michael.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: paulus@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Enable DEEPNAP power savings mode on 970MP
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:25:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200610052125.15305.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061004234141.749b13fb@localhost.localdomain>

On Thursday 05 October 2006 06:41, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Without this patch, on an idle system I get:
> 
> cpu-power-0:21.638
> cpu-power-1:27.102
> cpu-power-2:29.343
> cpu-power-3:25.784
> Total: 103.8W
> 
> With this patch:
> 
> cpu-power-0:11.730
> cpu-power-1:17.185
> cpu-power-2:18.547
> cpu-power-3:17.528
> Total: 65.0W
> 
> If I lower HZ to 100, I can get it as low as:
> 
> cpu-power-0:10.938
> cpu-power-1:16.021
> cpu-power-2:17.245
> cpu-power-3:16.145
> Total: 60.2W
> 
> Another (older) Quad G5 went from 54W to 39W at HZ=250.
> 
> Coming back out of Deep Nap takes 40-70 cycles longer than coming back
> from just Nap (which already takes quite a while). I don't think it'll
> be a performance issue (interrupt latency on an idle system), but in
> case someone does measurements feel free to report them.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>

Acked-by: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>

I am running DEEPNAP on my Quad since quite some time and I
did not see any problems.
It saves quite a bit of power (I think it was about 20W for me when
I measured it)
That's really worth it.

-- 
Greetings Michael.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-10-05 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-05  4:41 [PATCH] powerpc: Enable DEEPNAP power savings mode on 970MP Olof Johansson
2006-10-05  5:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-10-05  5:34   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-10-05 14:21   ` Olof Johansson
2006-10-05 14:21     ` Olof Johansson
2006-10-05 19:25 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2006-10-05 19:25   ` Michael Buesch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200610052125.15305.mb@bu3sch.de \
    --to=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.