From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: new p4-clockmod capable CPUs Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 14:44:49 -0400 Message-ID: <20061007184449.GD3732@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, Dominik Brodowski On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 06:46:12AM -0700, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: > >Ah. Thanks. Now only the new Celerons and Xeons confuse me -- they're > >family 6, model 14, stepping 8. Is Ap B1 still valid, as they're called > >Xeons (and Celerons)? > > > >I am confused by all these marketing names being re-used and > >re-used and > >re-used and re-used.... sorry ;) > > > > Hmm... That above doc gives MSR details but doesn't seem to say how to > identify a Core/Core 2 processor. I had to look for another ref here. > http://download.intel.com/design/mobile/SPECUPDT/30922205.pdf > Which says as long as family is 0xf and model 0xe, you can assume it to > be Core microarch. And model 0xf will be core 2 in a similar way. > Irrespective of final marketing name that they may acquire. It's usually handy to look at the x86info source[1], as most of the time, I've done the head-scratching to figure out stuff like this already :) Dave [1] http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/x86info/ -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk