From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Ezust Subject: Re: testing installation of conntrack command line tool Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:09:46 -0700 Message-ID: <200610121609.47726.alan.ezust@presinet.com> References: <200610031518.10097.alan.ezust@presinet.com> <45279039.8090309@netfilter.org> <200610121301.06023.alan.ezust@presinet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: "Pablo Neira Ayuso" In-Reply-To: <200610121301.06023.alan.ezust@presinet.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Here is a little follow-up - I discovered that regardless of what kernel options I enabled, I am unable to actually build the nf_conntrack_core or nf_conntrack_standalone sources in net/netfilter with the Makefile that is generated by linux 2.6.16.29. Currently, the generated Makefile in net/netfilter only builds these files: nf_conntrack_core, nf_conntrack_standalone, if CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK is defined. However, there doesn't seem to be such a config option available in the kernel configuration for this version. Adding a line CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK to my .config file doesn't seem to make a difference. So in fact, when I thought I was building conntrack, I was not. Is this a known issue? On Thursday 12 October 2006 13:01, Alan Ezust wrote: > Hi Pablo, > > I'm still having the same problem. I built libnfnetlink and libnfconntrack > from svn, adn then I built conntrack userspace tool 1.0beta2. All of the > errors in dmesg are gone now. > > conntrack -L conntrack still lists nothing. > > Here is my latest kernel .config file. I am still having the same problem > with the conntrack userspace tool, running with Linux 2.6.16.29 - so I'm > thinking I will have to upgrade to 2.6.18, but alas, that causes breakages > with some of the patchlets that we are maintaining, so I wanted to put that > off til later. > > Is there anything obviously wrong/missing about this kernel configuration? > > If there are definite incompatibilities with conntrack 1.00beta2 and linux > 2.6.16.29, please let me know and I'll stop barking up this tree... > > $ lsmod > > nfnetlink_queue 12384 0 > ipt_recent 11180 2 > ipt_LOG 6496 4 > ipt_bin 22020 7 > iptable_promisc 1856 1 > ipt_multiport 2432 10 > ip_conntrack_pptp 10544 0 > ip_conntrack_netbios_ns 2784 0 > ip_conntrack_irc 6456 0 > xt_CONNMARK 2208 2 > xt_connmark 1760 2 > ipt_DATA 4192 5 > ipt_psd 44036 1 > xt_state 1888 4 > xt_conntrack 2304 4 > xt_pkttype 1664 1 > xt_MARK 2368 0 > ipt_regex 7752 1 > tulip 49952 0 > eepro100 30576 0 > 8139too 25376 0 > 3c59x 44104 0