From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [202.173.155.195] (helo=birgitte.twibble.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1GYuZs-0004au-K7 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 03:14:09 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by birgitte.twibble.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09EC49E0A2; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 11:07:31 +1000 (EST) Received: from birgitte.twibble.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (birgitte [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13522-06; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 11:07:29 +1000 (EST) Received: from nynaeve.twibble.org (nynaeve.twibble.org [202.173.155.194]) by birgitte.twibble.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DC69E0A0; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 11:07:29 +1000 (EST) Received: by nynaeve.twibble.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 441E513A4741; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 11:07:29 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 11:07:29 +1000 From: Jamie Lenehan To: Marcin Juszkiewicz Message-ID: <20061015010729.GA17887@twibble.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jamie Lenehan , Marcin Juszkiewicz , openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <200610142209.32403.openembedded@hrw.one.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200610142209.32403.openembedded@hrw.one.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd at twibble.org Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: Review of revision cdf57334d92107e67da0a4fcde849921042f581a X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list Reply-To: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Linux Distributions List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Linux Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 01:14:09 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 10:09:30PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >=20 > Can someone look at revision cdf57334d92107e67da0a4fcde849921042f581a t= o=20 > check my hack? Looks wrong... you are building for arm right? With your hack and building on i486 I get: | ccache i486-linux-gcc -nostdlib -nostartfiles -Wall -I. -g -fomit-fra= me-pointer -O2 -fPIC -c -o io_getevents.ol io_getevents.c | io_getevents.c:43: error: redefinition of =E2=80=98io_getevents_0_4=E2= =80=99 | io_getevents.c:25: error: previous definition of =E2=80=98io_getevent= s_0_4=E2=80=99 was here | make[1]: *** [io_getevents.ol] Error 1 | make[1]: Leaving directory /data/oe/build/wrap-glibc/tmp/work/libaio-= 0.3.106-r1/libaio-0.3.106/src' I think the real problem is a typo in syscall-arm.h --- libaio-0.3.106/src/syscall-arm.h 2006/10/15 01:02:35 1.1 +++ libaio-0.3.106/src/syscall-arm.h 2006/10/15 01:02:43 @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ } =20 #define io_syscall5(type,fname,sname,type1,arg1,type2,arg2,type3,arg3,ty= pe4,arg4,type5,arg5) \ -type ffname(type1 arg1, type2 arg2, type3 arg3, type4 arg4, type5 arg5) = {\ +type fname(type1 arg1, type2 arg2, type3 arg3, type4 arg4, type5 arg5) {= \ __SYS_REG(sname) \ register long __r0 __asm__("r0") =3D (long)arg1; \ register long __r1 __asm__("r1") =3D (long)arg2; \ This file is added by 00_arches.patch. So updating that patch with the one line change above should be enough. --=20 Jamie Lenehan