All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: wcheng@sourceware.org <wcheng@sourceware.org>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] cluster/gfs-kernel/src/gfs ops_inode.c
Date: 15 Oct 2006 07:25:14 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061015072514.21254.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)

CVSROOT:	/cvs/cluster
Module name:	cluster
Changes by:	wcheng at sourceware.org	2006-10-15 07:25:14

Modified files:
	gfs-kernel/src/gfs: ops_inode.c 

Log message:
	Just found 2.6.18 kernel has something called down_read_non_onwer for
	rwsemaphore. If we can implement a similar function that does something
	like "up_write_if_owner", then we can put i_alloc_sem back to correct
	state. Correct the comment and mark this possibility.

Patches:
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/cluster/gfs-kernel/src/gfs/ops_inode.c.diff?cvsroot=cluster&r1=1.13&r2=1.14

--- cluster/gfs-kernel/src/gfs/ops_inode.c	2006/10/15 06:32:06	1.13
+++ cluster/gfs-kernel/src/gfs/ops_inode.c	2006/10/15 07:25:09	1.14
@@ -1349,14 +1349,13 @@
 	 * To avoid this to happen, i_alloc_sem must be dropped and trust
 	 * be put into glock that it can carry the same protection. 
 	 *
-	 * One issue with dropping i_alloc_sem is gfs_setattr() can be 
-	 * called from other code path without this sempaphore. Since linux
-	 * semaphore implementation doesn't include owner id, we have no way 
-	 * to reliably decide whether the following "up" is a correct reset. 
-	 * This implies if i_alloc_sem is ever used by non-direct_IO code 
-	 * path in the future, this hack will fall apart. In short, with this 
-	 * change, i_alloc_sem has become a meaningless lock within GFS and 
-	 * don't expect its counter representing any correct state. 
+	 * One issue with dropping i_alloc_sem is that the gfs_setattr() 
+	 * can be invoked from other code path without this sempaphore. 
+	 * We'll need a new rwsem function that can "up" the semaphore 
+	 * only when it is needed. Before that happens (will research the 
+	 * possibility), i_alloc_sem (now) is a meaningless lock within 
+	 * GFS. If it is ever been used by other non-directIO code, this
+	 * hack will fall apart.
 	 *
 	 * wcheng at redhat.com 10/14/06  
 	 */ 



             reply	other threads:[~2006-10-15  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-15  7:25 wcheng [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-11 22:15 [Cluster-devel] cluster/gfs-kernel/src/gfs ops_inode.c rpeterso
2007-07-11 21:58 rpeterso
2007-06-29 21:57 rpeterso
2007-06-05 18:21 wcheng
2007-06-05 17:46 wcheng
2007-01-18 20:40 wcheng
2006-10-23 20:47 bmarzins
2006-10-03 17:27 rohara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061015072514.21254.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=wcheng@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.