From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [202.173.155.195] (helo=birgitte.twibble.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1GZFK8-00011O-Hd for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 01:23:16 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by birgitte.twibble.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326B011148; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:16:33 +1000 (EST) Received: from birgitte.twibble.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (birgitte [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15072-09; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:16:31 +1000 (EST) Received: from nynaeve.twibble.org (nynaeve.twibble.org [202.173.155.194]) by birgitte.twibble.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8030910B5A; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:16:31 +1000 (EST) Received: by nynaeve.twibble.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 7177312CB9CB; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:16:31 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:16:31 +1000 From: Jamie Lenehan To: Koen Kooi Message-ID: <20061015231631.GA6215@twibble.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jamie Lenehan , Koen Kooi , openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <20061015003742.GB12679@twibble.org> <4531ED53.1050506@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4531ED53.1050506@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd at twibble.org Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [oe-commits] org.oe.dev strace: bump pr after last patch X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Linux Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 23:23:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 10:12:03AM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: [...] > > Was there some reason for this? (Just to make sure I didn't miss > > something!) In this case it had no effect on any existing strace > > build (the change is a no-op for glibc < 2.5) and since glibc 2.5 > > didn't build previously it can't have had any change on glibc 2.5 > > built strace's... > > People who's build broke (like me :) ) wouldn't get past it because OE tries to finish > building the unpatched version. I was trying to avoid the 'I updated and it still fails' Ahh, yep... that is something I didn't think of. I'll keep that in mind in the future. Thanks! -- Jamie Lenehan