All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
To: David Johnson <dj@david-web.co.uk>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hardware bug or kernel bug?
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:25:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061016102500.GA1709@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200610131724.40631.dj@david-web.co.uk>

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 05:24:39PM +0100, David Johnson wrote:
> On Friday 13 October 2006 14:06, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >
> > Probably - but only with networking. So I'd try with this debugging
> > like in my first reply plus maybe 2.6.19-rc1 (e1000 - btw. I hope
> > this other tested card was different model - and locking improved)
> > and resend conclusions to netdev@vger.kernel.org.
> >
> 
> OK I built a 2.6.19-rc1 kernel with a minimal config as you describe and I 
> cannot reproduce the reboots with this kernel. My .config:
> http://www.david-web.co.uk/download/config

I've seen more minimal minimal configs but if it works
it is 50% of success. 

> The other NIC I tried was a D-Link DL10050-based card which I think uses the 
> dl2k module.
> 
> I tried to reproduce the problem under Windows (2k), which didn't reboot but 
> did still suffer from it I believe. Randomly during an scp transfer (using 
> the PuTTY scp client) Windows will lock-up for about 30 seconds, making an 
> entry in the event log indicating that there was a time-out talking to the 
> IDE controller, then continuing. Could the same thing be happening in Linux? 
> If Linux can't talk to the IDE controller when trying to write to disk, how 
> does it handle that?

Was this lock-up effect visible during above 2.6.19-rc1 tests?
If not I'd try to continue linux debbuging:
- is 2.6.19-rc1 working with "normal" config (use make oldconfig
to "upgrade" .config),
- is 2.6.17 working with "minimal" config (use make oldconfig),
- changing one or two options at a time try to find which one makes
the effect returns (acpi, smp...). 

Regards,
Jarek P.

PS: Sorry for late reply - I was offline.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-10-16 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-12 16:53 Hardware bug or kernel bug? David Johnson
2006-10-12 17:20 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-12 19:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-13  9:20   ` David Johnson
2006-10-13  8:56 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-10-13  9:20   ` David Johnson
2006-10-13 10:58     ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-10-13 11:56       ` David Johnson
2006-10-13 13:06         ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-10-13 16:24           ` David Johnson
2006-10-13 17:11             ` Alan Cox
2006-10-16 10:25             ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2006-10-16 14:32               ` David Johnson
2006-10-17  7:10                 ` Jarek Poplawski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061016102500.GA1709@ff.dom.local \
    --to=jarkao2@o2.pl \
    --cc=dj@david-web.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.