All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, johnstul@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386 Time: Avoid PIT SMP lockups
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:42:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200610162042.27292.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061016113937.a76f8d06.akpm@osdl.org>

On Monday 16 October 2006 20:39, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On 16 Oct 2006 15:48:02 +0200
> Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
> 
> > Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes:
> > > 
> > > Is there any actual need to hold xtime_lock while doing the port IO?  I'd
> > > have thought it would suffice to do
> > > 
> > > 	temp = port_io
> > > 	write_seqlock(xtime_lock);
> > > 	xtime = muck_with(temp);
> > > 	write_sequnlock(xtime_lock);
> > > 
> > > ?
> > 
> > That would be a good idea in general. The trouble is just that whatever race
> > is there will be still there then, just harder to trigger (so instead of 
> > every third boot it will muck up every 6 weeks). Not sure that is
> > a real improvement.
> > 
> 
> Confused.  What race are you referring to?

Sorry s/race/starvation/

> 
> This is addressing a starvation problem which is due to the slowness of the
> port-io (iirc).

Is it just sure to go away when the critical section is shorter?

-Andi


 

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-16 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-11 19:54 [PATCH] i386 Time: Avoid PIT SMP lockups john stultz
2006-10-11 21:26 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-11 22:48   ` john stultz
2006-10-11 23:03     ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-16 13:48       ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-16 18:39         ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-16 18:42           ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-10-16 19:09             ` john stultz
2006-10-18 16:16   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2006-10-18 16:27     ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-18 16:45       ` Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200610162042.27292.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.