From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Aron Griffis <aron@hp.com>
Subject: Re: Has 3.0.3 been released?
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:01:24 -0400
Message-ID: <20061017220124.GD27879@fc.hp.com>
References: <453545DA.7080100@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <453545DA.7080100@us.ibm.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

And a couple follow-up questions...

Will xen-unstable move forward to (at least) 2.6.18 now?

Will the tree structure change from the current sparse model to
a fully-populated kernel?  IMHO it wouldn't be too hard to use
something similar to
http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/linux-2.6.tip-xen.hg plus a top-level
xen directory containing the hypervisor.  Alternatively, since Xen
isn't just Linux, maybe the hypervisor and kernels should be in
separate repositories?

Aron