From: Ingo Oeser <netdev@axxeo.de>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: dada1@cosmosbay.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [NET] reduce sizeof(struct flow)
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:33:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200610181333.50953.netdev@axxeo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061017.222709.130237201.davem@davemloft.net>
Hi David,
David Miller schrieb:
> I don't like these kinds of patches because %99 of people will never
> ever realize the "savings" because distribution vendors will always,
> unlaterally, enable everything.
People producing Linux Appliances DO compile their own kernels.
And some distribution vendors are still at 2.6.8-$WHACKY_PATCHES
or similiar, which is not usable for many things
(e.g. IPsec, SIP behind NAT etc.).
But I agree that workings towards smaller size in "make allyesconfig"
is much better :-)
Regards
Ingo Oeser
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-18 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20051217071029.GY23384@wotan.suse.de>
[not found] ` <20051216.231517.68922847.davem@davemloft.net>
[not found] ` <43A3EE8A.5020907@cosmosbay.com>
[not found] ` <43CCBF3D.2070900@cosmosbay.com>
[not found] ` <4415A4C1.1030906@cosmosbay.com>
2006-10-12 20:14 ` [PATCH] [NET] reduce sizeof(struct inet_peer), cleanup, change in peer_check_expire() Eric Dumazet
2006-10-12 22:15 ` David Miller
2006-10-13 3:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-13 4:18 ` David Miller
2006-10-13 4:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-18 5:08 ` [PATCH] [NET] reduce sizeof(struct flow) Eric Dumazet
2006-10-18 5:17 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2006-10-18 5:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-18 5:27 ` David Miller
2006-10-18 5:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-18 6:53 ` David Miller
2006-10-18 8:20 ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-10-18 8:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-18 12:42 ` Steven Whitehouse
2006-10-18 13:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-19 3:50 ` David Miller
2006-10-19 5:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-20 13:55 ` [PATCH] [NET] reduce sizeof(struct flowi) by 20 bytes Eric Dumazet
2006-10-22 3:25 ` David Miller
2006-10-18 11:33 ` Ingo Oeser [this message]
2006-10-20 7:18 ` [PATCH] [NET] can use __get_cpu_var() instead of per_cpu() in loopback driver Eric Dumazet
2006-10-20 7:32 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200610181333.50953.netdev@axxeo.de \
--to=netdev@axxeo.de \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.