From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Error message for device not found at
	blkif.py
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:28:47 -0300
Message-ID: <20061018212846.GC16266@redhat.com>
References: <20061018200845.GB16266@redhat.com> <453695B2.9080307@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <453695B2.9080307@us.ibm.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 03:59:30PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Instead of throwing a VmError, could you subclass VmError with a more 
> specific error and throw that?
Fore sure I can. But what does this condition have so differently from
others that justifies that for it only? Although I agree with you that 
such a specificiness is good, VmError is being thrown everywhere, meaning 
that your proposal would require touching a great amount of code change.
Is there any plans/opposals for that?
 

-- 
Glauber de Oliveira Costa
Red Hat Inc.
"Free as in Freedom"