From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jazzhorn.ncsc.mil (mummy.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.129]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k9JDc9FU004767 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:38:09 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (jazzhorn.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.9]) by jazzhorn.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k9JDbQwO024249 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:37:26 GMT From: Steve Grubb To: redhat-lspp@redhat.com Subject: Re: [redhat-lspp] Re: MLS enforcing PTYs, sshd, and newrole Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:32:11 -0400 Cc: Daniel J Walsh , casey@schaufler-ca.com, russell@coker.com.au, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov References: <20061012153701.75777.qmail@web36603.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <45377BF0.6010403@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <45377BF0.6010403@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200610190932.12006.sgrubb@redhat.com> Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Thursday 19 October 2006 09:21, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > If we then remove -l from newrole we are done? And would doing this also mean we do not need to add pam_namespace to newrole? -Steve -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.