From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add support for OpenBSD
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:21:42 +0200
Message-ID: <200610191621.43250.Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
References: <C15D1EAB.2CA0%Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <C15D1EAB.2CA0%Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Thursday 19 October 2006 13:23, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 18/10/06 09:55, "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@amd.com> wrote:
> >> Is there a standard definition for these functions (i.e., can we be
> >> *sure* the original definitions have the same semantics as our own)? If
> >> not, which I think is the case, we're better off #undef'ing the old
> >> definitions.
> >
> > This is the snippet of /usr/include/endian.h:
>
> Well, that doesn't indicate whether the semantics of swap<16,32,etc> is
> standardised or not. I'll fix in mkelf32 by undef'ing.

Thanks. I'm awaiting your commit. :-)