From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [195.149.226.213] (helo=smtp.host4.kei.pl) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GaoWs-0007J8-5T for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:10:54 +0200 Received: (qmail 1906 invoked by uid 813007); 20 Oct 2006 07:03:46 -0000 X-clamdmail: clamdmail 0.18a Received: from v813.rev.tld.pl (HELO home.lan) (marcin@hrw.one.pl@195.149.226.213) by smtp.host4.kei.pl with ESMTPA; 20 Oct 2006 07:03:45 -0000 From: Marcin Juszkiewicz To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:04:08 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <20061019213932.GA30714@twibble.org> In-Reply-To: <20061019213932.GA30714@twibble.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200610200904.08999.openembedded@hrw.one.pl> Subject: Re: [oe-commits] org.oe.dev glibc: drop 2.4, since it is confirmed to be nonworking on arm X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Linux Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 07:10:54 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Dnia czwartek, 19 pa=BCdziernika 2006 23:39, Jamie Lenehan napisa=B3: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 09:45:21PM +0200, "koen commit" wrote: > > glibc: drop 2.4, since it is confirmed to be nonworking on arm Koen: next time *check* does something use what you plan to remove.=20 Especially with such *important* packages like toolchain/libc ones. > Hmm, was this really necessary? Surely marking it broken for arm > would have been enough for now? Should be enough. > I'm sure I'm not the only one running glibc 2.4 on lots of non-arm > devices and now have to either add glibc 2.4 back in to OE locally > and/or get all my devices upgraded (which will happen, once I've > finished testing with glibc 2.5, no other glibc's build here except > 2.4 and 2.5.) > And I'm sure there'll be a lot of people wondering why OE is suddenly > building an older version of glibc. I reverted koen's changeset and added DEFAULT_PREFERENCE_arm =3D "-1" so AR= M=20 builds will skip it. =2D-=20 JID: hrw-jabber.org OpenEmbedded developer/consultant