From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, zach.brown@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] O_DIRECT locking rework
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:30:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061020123058.8b422339.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061020183237.GA8674@think.oraclecorp.com>
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:32:37 -0400
Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> O_DIRECT locking currently uses a few different per-inode locks to
> prevent races between buffered io and direct io. This is awkward, and
> sometimes grows races where we expose old data on disk.
>
> For example, I can't quite see how we protect from an mmap triggered
> writepage from filling a hole in the middle of an O_DIRECT read.
>
> This patch set changes O_DIRECT to use page locks instead of
> mutex/semaphores. It looks in the radix tree for pages affected by this
> O_DIRECT read/wrte and locks any pages it finds.
>
> For any pages not present, a stub page struct is inserted into the
> radix tree. The page cache routines are changed to either wait on this
> place holder page or ignore it as appropriate. Place holders are not
> valid pages at all, you can't trust page->index or any other field.
>
> The first patch introduces these place holder pages. The second patch
> changes fs/direct-io.c to use them. Patch #2 needs work,
> direct-io.c:lock_page_range can be made much faster, and it needs to be
> changed to work in chunks instead of pinning down the whole range at
> once.
>
> But, this is enough for people to comment on the basic idea. Testing
> has been very light. I'm not sure I've covered all of the buffered vs
> direct races yet. The main goal of posting now is to talk about the
> place holder pages and possible optimizations.
>
> For the XFS guys, you probably want to avoid the page locking steps as
> well, a later version will honor that.
>
Boy, it doesn't do much to simplify the code, does it? An opportunity for
Linus to again share with us his opinions on direct-io.
Conceptually, sticking locked pages into the mapping is a good thing to do,
because it meshes in with all our existing synchronisation design.
I think the fake placeholder page can be a kernel-wide thing rather than
per-dio? That would be most desirable because then we have
#define PagePlaceHolder(page) (page == global_placeholder_page)
which saves a precious page flag.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-20 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-20 18:32 [RFC PATCH 0/2] O_DIRECT locking rework Chris Mason
2006-10-20 18:38 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] placeholder pages Chris Mason
2006-10-20 18:41 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] page cache locking for O_DIRECT Chris Mason
2006-10-20 19:30 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-10-20 20:03 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] O_DIRECT locking rework Zach Brown
2006-10-20 20:12 ` Chris Mason
2006-10-20 20:05 ` Chris Mason
2006-10-20 20:23 ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-24 19:34 ` Chris Mason
2006-10-24 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] placeholder pages Chris Mason
2006-10-24 19:40 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] O_DIRECT locking via placeholders Chris Mason
2006-10-24 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] O_DIRECT locking rework Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-24 20:50 ` Chris Mason
2006-10-24 21:52 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-24 22:22 ` Chris Mason
2006-10-24 22:47 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-10-24 22:37 ` Russell Cattelan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061020123058.8b422339.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.