From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>,
nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, akpm@osdl.org, menage@google.com,
Simon.Derr@bull.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dino@in.ibm.com, rohitseth@google.com, holt@sgi.com,
dipankar@in.ibm.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 22:26:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061022222652.B2526@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061022035135.2c450147.pj@sgi.com>; from pj@sgi.com on Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 03:51:35AM -0700
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 03:51:35AM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Martin wrote:
> > We (Google) are planning to use it to do some partitioning, albeit on
> > much smaller machines. I'd really like to NOT use cpus_allowed from
> > previous experience - if we can get it to to partition using separated
> > sched domains, that would be much better.
>
> Why not use cpus_allowed for this, via cpusets and/or sched_setaffinity?
group of pinned tasks can completely skew the system load balancing..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-23 5:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-19 9:23 [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets Paul Jackson
2006-10-19 10:24 ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-19 19:03 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-19 19:21 ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-19 19:50 ` Martin Bligh
2006-10-20 0:14 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-20 16:03 ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-20 17:29 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-10-20 19:19 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-20 19:00 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-20 20:30 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2006-10-20 21:41 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-20 22:35 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2006-10-20 23:14 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-10-21 5:37 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-23 4:31 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-10-23 5:59 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-21 23:05 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-22 12:02 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-23 3:09 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-20 21:46 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-21 18:23 ` Paul Menage
2006-10-21 20:55 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-21 20:59 ` Paul Menage
2006-10-22 10:51 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-23 5:26 ` Siddha, Suresh B [this message]
2006-10-23 5:54 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-23 5:43 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-10-23 6:02 ` Nick Piggin
2006-10-23 6:16 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-23 16:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-09 10:59 ` Paul Jackson
2006-10-23 16:01 ` Christoph Lameter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-30 21:26 [RFC] cpuset: Remove " Dinakar Guniguntala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061022222652.B2526@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=Simon.Derr@bull.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dino@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=rohitseth@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.