From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Subject: Re: [Q] about Credit Scheduler Dom0 Scheduling policy. Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:47:34 +0300 Message-ID: <20061026134734.GE29290@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20061023143210.GA26848@cockermouth.uk.xensource.com> <200610240647.k9O6lYQR004608@fjmscan503.ms.jp.fujitsu.com> <20061025102948.GA32281@cockermouth.uk.xensource.com> <200610251303.k9PD3CpQ017617@fjmscan501.ms.jp.fujitsu.com> <20061025140337.GA819@cockermouth.uk.xensource.com> <200610260615.k9Q6FiKi015422@fjmscan502.ms.jp.fujitsu.com> <200610260835.k9Q8ZvZZ025347@fjmscan502.ms.jp.fujitsu.com> <20061026084210.GA3497@cockermouth.uk.xensource.com> <20061026125245.GD29290@edu.joroinen.fi> <20061026130413.GA5062@cockermouth.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061026130413.GA5062@cockermouth.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Atsushi SAKAI , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:04:13PM +0100, Emmanuel Ackaouy wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 03:52:45PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > Is this patch going to be submitted for 3.0.3-1 or only for unstable (3.0.4)? > > > > -- Pasi > > I'm going to push the patch to xen-unstable. > > I hadn't planned to ask for it to trickle down to 3.0.3. > I'm not sure it's that critical a fix. Why do you ask? Thanks for your answer. I'm asking so that I know what I should be running when I test/benchmark workloads affected by this :) -- Pasi