From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@amd.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@il.ibm.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reset more to default when clear irq_vector for destroy_irq
Date: 28 Oct 2006 19:29:41 +0200
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 19:29:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061028172941.GA92790@muc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86802c440610272244q750f35a7hcbed50e58546d97@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 10:44:36PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> revised version according to Eric. and it can be applied clearly to
> current Linus's Tree.
>
> Clear the irq releated entries in irq_vector, irq_domain and vector_irq
> instead of clearing irq_vector only. So when new irq is created, it
> could reuse that vector. (actually is the second loop scanning from
> FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR+8). This could avoid the vectors are used up
> with enough module inserting and removing
Added thanks.
Does i386 need a similar patch?
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-28 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-25 16:40 [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reset more to default when clear irq_vector for destroy_irq Lu, Yinghai
2006-10-27 6:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-28 5:44 ` Yinghai Lu
2006-10-28 9:18 ` Oleg Verych
2006-10-28 17:29 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-10-28 20:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-24 21:33 Lu, Yinghai
2006-10-24 22:52 ` Josef Sipek
2006-10-25 3:46 ` Yinghai Lu
2006-10-25 4:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2006-10-25 4:52 ` David Rientjes
2006-10-25 6:01 ` yhlu
2006-10-25 11:30 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061028172941.GA92790@muc.de \
--to=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=muli@il.ibm.com \
--cc=yinghai.lu@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.