From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Horst Schirmeier <horst@schirmeier.com>
Cc: Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>,
dsd@gentoo.org, kernel@gentoo.org, draconx@gmail.com,
jpdenheijer@gmail.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] replacement for broken kbuild-dont-put-temp-files-in-the-source-tree.patch
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:19:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200610310119.10567.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061031001235.GE2933@quickstop.soohrt.org>
> The problem is, this brings us back to the problem where this whole
> patch orgy began: Gentoo Portage sandbox violations when writing (the
> null symlink) to the kernel tree when building external modules. What
> about using $(M) as a base directory if it is defined?
I think Jan's $(objdir)/.tmp proposal would be cleanest. Just someone
has to implement it :)
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-31 0:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-28 23:07 [PATCH -mm] replacement for broken kbuild-dont-put-temp-files-in-the-source-tree.patch Horst Schirmeier
2006-10-29 2:07 ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-29 12:08 ` Horst Schirmeier
2006-10-29 16:16 ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-29 17:52 ` Oleg Verych
2006-10-29 22:52 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-10-30 8:16 ` Jan Beulich
2006-10-30 13:16 ` Oleg Verych
[not found] ` <45460E6C.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
2006-10-30 14:42 ` Oleg Verych
2006-10-30 15:22 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-10-30 16:06 ` Oleg Verych
2006-10-30 22:12 ` Oleg Verych
2006-10-31 0:12 ` Horst Schirmeier
2006-10-31 0:19 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-10-31 1:14 ` Horst Schirmeier
2006-10-31 13:51 ` Oleg Verych
2006-11-02 12:46 ` Jan Peter den Heijer
2006-11-17 5:17 ` kbuild: O= with M= (Re: [PATCH -mm] replacement for broken kbuild-dont-put-temp-files-in-the-source-tree.patch) Oleg Verych
2007-01-23 7:36 ` [fix, rfc] " Oleg Verych
2007-01-24 8:54 ` [patch] kbuild: improving option checking " Oleg Verych
2007-01-24 16:06 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-01-24 19:28 ` [patch] spell 4 kbuild: improving option checking Oleg Verych
2006-10-31 0:27 ` [PATCH -mm] replacement for broken kbuild-dont-put-temp-files-in-the-source-tree.patch Horst Schirmeier
2006-10-31 13:32 ` Oleg Verych
2006-11-15 14:17 ` kbuild-mm: $(objtree)/knull vs mktemp (was Re: [PATCH -mm] replacement for broken kbuild-dont-put-temp-files-in-the-source-tree.patch) Oleg Verych
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200610310119.10567.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=draconx@gmail.com \
--cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=horst@schirmeier.com \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=jpdenheijer@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@gentoo.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olecom@flower.upol.cz \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.