From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: ipw3945? Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:58:05 -0500 Message-ID: <20061031215759.GF9101@tuxdriver.com> References: <45464A55.20803@feuerpokemon.de> <1162262662.15085.59.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> <20061031123337.GA9101@tuxdriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dragoran , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:19 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423670AbWJaV6Z (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:58:25 -0500 To: Zhu Yi Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061031123337.GA9101@tuxdriver.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:33:43AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:44:21AM +0800, Zhu Yi wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 19:54 +0100, dragoran wrote: > > > Can this be used to make the driver work without the daemon? > > > > Yup. And we have already successfully put the daemon's work into the > > firmware/ucode. The new firmware will be released soon. Stay tuned. > > Please define "soon". I am a bit tired of hearing about how this is > just around the corner, only to find-out that it is months away. For the record, my "months away" comment seems to have been based on a misunderstanding of some prior postings. I apologize for any confusion or embarassment which I might have caused. John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com