From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] paravirtualization: header and stubs for paravirtualizing critical operations Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 22:18:03 -0800 Message-ID: <20061104221803.3871c3d3.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20061029024504.760769000@sous-sol.org> <200611032209.40235.ak@suse.de> <1162701815.29777.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200611050646.15334.ak@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200611050646.15334.ak@suse.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Andi Kleen Cc: Chris Wright , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Sun, 5 Nov 2006 06:46:15 +0100 Andi Kleen wrote: > = > > Andi, the patches work against Andrew's tree, and he's merged them in > > rc4-mm2. There are a few warnings to clean up, but it seems basically > > sound. > > = > > At this point I our think time is better spent on beating those patches > > up, rather than going back and figuring out why they don't work in your > > tree. > = > My tree is basically mainline as base. Sure if you don't care about mainl= ine > merges we can ignore it there and keep it forever in -mm* until Andrew > gets tired of it? > = > That's a possible strategy, but only if you want to keep it as a mm-only > toy forever. > = They're in my regular list-of-thing-to-spam-maintainers-with, so we can transfer them as-is next week sometime. It would be better to sort out the various warnings and any other nasties f= irst though. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161109AbWKEGSi (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Nov 2006 01:18:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161134AbWKEGSi (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Nov 2006 01:18:38 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:63667 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161130AbWKEGSh (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Nov 2006 01:18:37 -0500 Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 22:18:03 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Andi Kleen Cc: Rusty Russell , Zachary Amsden , Chris Wright , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] paravirtualization: header and stubs for paravirtualizing critical operations Message-Id: <20061104221803.3871c3d3.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200611050646.15334.ak@suse.de> References: <20061029024504.760769000@sous-sol.org> <200611032209.40235.ak@suse.de> <1162701815.29777.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200611050646.15334.ak@suse.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 5 Nov 2006 06:46:15 +0100 Andi Kleen wrote: > > > Andi, the patches work against Andrew's tree, and he's merged them in > > rc4-mm2. There are a few warnings to clean up, but it seems basically > > sound. > > > > At this point I our think time is better spent on beating those patches > > up, rather than going back and figuring out why they don't work in your > > tree. > > My tree is basically mainline as base. Sure if you don't care about mainline > merges we can ignore it there and keep it forever in -mm* until Andrew > gets tired of it? > > That's a possible strategy, but only if you want to keep it as a mm-only > toy forever. > They're in my regular list-of-thing-to-spam-maintainers-with, so we can transfer them as-is next week sometime. It would be better to sort out the various warnings and any other nasties first though.