From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk,
Christian <christiand59@web.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [discuss] Linux 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:49:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061106174928.GB19283@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061106173528.GQ5778@stusta.de>
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 06:35:28PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> config X86_POWERNOW_K8
> tristate "AMD Opteron/Athlon64 PowerNow!"
> select CPU_FREQ_TABLE
> depends (ACPI_PROCESSOR || ACPI_PROCESSOR=n)
>
> But in the end, the best solution depends on how many percent of the
> X86_POWERNOW_K8 users have Christian's problem of requiring
> ACPI_PROCESSOR. If there are only very few people with this problem, I'd
> say leave it as it is.
Well, it's been this way for a while, and only recently this has come up.
There was a similar report for powernow-k7, which has a similar construct.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Christian <christiand59@web.de>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey_y_starikovskiy@linux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [discuss] Linux 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:49:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061106174928.GB19283@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061106173528.GQ5778@stusta.de>
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 06:35:28PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> config X86_POWERNOW_K8
> tristate "AMD Opteron/Athlon64 PowerNow!"
> select CPU_FREQ_TABLE
> depends (ACPI_PROCESSOR || ACPI_PROCESSOR=n)
>
> But in the end, the best solution depends on how many percent of the
> X86_POWERNOW_K8 users have Christian's problem of requiring
> ACPI_PROCESSOR. If there are only very few people with this problem, I'd
> say leave it as it is.
Well, it's been this way for a while, and only recently this has come up.
There was a similar report for powernow-k7, which has a similar construct.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-06 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-31 4:27 Linux 2.6.19-rc4 Linus Torvalds
2006-10-31 5:34 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-31 14:43 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2006-10-31 16:44 ` Linux 2.6.19-rc4: udev compatibility broken? Mark Lord
2006-10-31 15:55 ` Linux 2.6.19-rc4 Linus Torvalds
2006-10-31 16:14 ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-10-31 16:34 ` Ray Lee
2006-10-31 16:51 ` Dave Jones
2006-10-31 21:26 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-10-31 22:39 ` Al Viro
2006-11-02 16:03 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-10-31 20:53 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-10-31 21:29 ` Al Viro
2006-11-01 6:33 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-11-01 20:26 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2006-11-01 21:04 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-11-02 21:19 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2006-10-31 18:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-10-31 18:36 ` Martin Bligh
2006-10-31 18:54 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-10-31 18:45 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-10-31 19:26 ` Russell King
2006-10-31 19:39 ` Martin Bligh
2006-10-31 17:02 ` CONFIG_USB_USBNET and mii_* (was Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc4) Athanasius
2006-10-31 17:11 ` Randy Dunlap
2006-10-31 19:56 ` 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions Adrian Bunk
2006-10-31 19:56 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-10-31 20:11 ` Greg KH
2006-10-31 20:11 ` Greg KH
2006-11-04 3:15 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-10-31 20:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-31 20:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-31 20:21 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-02 20:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-02 20:10 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-02 21:22 ` Auke Kok
2006-11-02 21:55 ` Alan Cox
2006-11-02 20:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-11-02 21:29 ` Greg KH
2006-11-02 21:26 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-02 21:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-31 20:08 ` 2.6.19-rc4: known regressions with patches Adrian Bunk
2006-11-03 2:41 ` Linux 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2) Adrian Bunk
2006-11-03 2:56 ` [discuss] " Dave Jones
2006-11-03 8:25 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-11-03 15:56 ` Dave Jones
2006-11-05 17:32 ` Christian
2006-11-05 20:04 ` Dave Jones
2006-11-06 17:35 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-06 17:49 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2006-11-06 17:49 ` Dave Jones
2006-11-06 6:00 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-06 15:43 ` Christian
2006-11-06 17:20 ` Dave Jones
2006-11-06 17:30 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-06 17:37 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-04 18:21 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Greg KH
2006-11-05 6:48 ` 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v3) Adrian Bunk
2006-11-05 6:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-05 9:30 ` Jeff Chua
2006-11-05 9:30 ` Jeff Chua
2006-11-06 17:47 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2006-11-06 17:47 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-05 13:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-11-05 13:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-11-05 13:57 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-05 15:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07 4:22 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-07 5:18 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-11-07 8:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07 16:19 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-11-07 17:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07 17:37 ` Dave Olson
2006-11-07 18:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07 20:30 ` Dave Olson
2006-11-07 20:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07 21:01 ` Dave Olson
2006-11-07 21:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07 21:41 ` Dave Olson
2006-11-07 22:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07 18:01 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-11-07 18:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07 21:32 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-11-07 22:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-08 5:14 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-11-08 11:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-05 15:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07 2:17 ` Ernst Herzberg
2006-11-07 2:17 ` Ernst Herzberg
2006-11-07 2:17 ` Ernst Herzberg
2006-11-07 5:41 ` Len Brown
2006-11-07 5:41 ` Len Brown
2006-11-07 20:05 ` Ernst Herzberg
2006-11-07 20:05 ` Ernst Herzberg
2006-11-08 8:36 ` [linux-pm] " Adrian Bunk
2006-11-06 12:48 ` 2.6.19-rc4: known regressions with patches (v2) Adrian Bunk
2006-11-07 13:30 ` 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v4) Adrian Bunk
2006-11-07 13:30 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061106174928.GB19283@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=christiand59@web.de \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.