All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Russell King <rmk-pci@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Eric W.Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
	"David S.Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 4/7] Powerpc MSI implementation
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 13:44:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061107204432.GZ27140@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061107201436.GE9533@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 08:14:36PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 01:07:30PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > We have the per-irq void *chip_data; could this be the right place to
> > keep it instead?  That way, it won't take up space in the pci_dev for
> > devices which don't use MSI.
> 
> Bah.  chip_data is supposed to be __iomem.  I bet if you build ARM
> with sparse it'll kick out lots of warnings as a result of that loss.

Erm, since when?  When I introduced it (back in January 2005 [1]), it
was called handler_data and pointed to a struct which is chip-type
dependent.  One of the items in that struct is an IO address, but we
need more than that.

Now we have something else called handler_data, and I must
admit to being quite confused what the difference is.  The comment in
the header files and the DocBook genericirq leave me quite confused.

[1] http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/old-2.6-bkcvs.git;a=commit;h=1dd15c35b6bc179cd9c2a47e13360052c1e938a3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-11-07 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-07  7:21 [RFC/PATCH 0/7] Powerpc MSI Implementation Michael Ellerman
2006-11-07  7:21 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/7] Make some MSI-X #defines generic Michael Ellerman
2006-11-13 18:31   ` patch pci-make-some-msi-x-defines-generic.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree gregkh
2006-11-07  7:21 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/7] Add #defines for Hypertransport MSI fields Michael Ellerman
2006-11-07  8:01   ` Segher Boessenkool
2006-11-07  7:21 ` [RFC/PATCH 3/7] Rip out the existing powerpc msi stubs Michael Ellerman
2006-11-07  7:21 ` [RFC/PATCH 5/7] RTAS MSI implementation Michael Ellerman
2006-11-08 20:16   ` Jake Moilanen
2006-11-08 23:35     ` Michael Ellerman
2006-11-07  7:21 ` [RFC/PATCH 4/7] Powerpc " Michael Ellerman
2006-11-07 20:07   ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-11-07 20:14     ` Russell King
2006-11-07 20:40       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-07 20:44       ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2006-11-07 20:48         ` Russell King
2006-11-07 21:02           ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-11-07 22:25             ` Russell King
2006-11-07 22:29               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-07 23:11                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-08  0:15                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-08  1:33                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-08  2:08                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-08  2:43                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-08  3:02                           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-07 20:39     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-07  7:21 ` [RFC/PATCH 6/7] MPIC MSI backend Michael Ellerman
2006-11-07  8:27   ` Segher Boessenkool
2006-11-07  8:42     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-07  9:04       ` Segher Boessenkool
2006-11-07  9:16         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-07 11:12           ` Segher Boessenkool
2006-11-07  7:21 ` [RFC/PATCH 7/7] Enable MSI on Powerpc Michael Ellerman
2006-11-07  7:41 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/7] Powerpc MSI Implementation Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-11-07  8:02   ` Greg KH
2006-11-08  5:18     ` Michael Ellerman
2006-11-08 10:26       ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-08 23:33         ` Michael Ellerman
2006-11-09  7:36           ` Segher Boessenkool
2006-11-13  6:05             ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061107204432.GZ27140@parisc-linux.org \
    --to=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rmk-pci@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.