From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix CONFIG_PARAVIRT for 2.6.19-rc5-mm1 Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:20:14 -0800 Message-ID: <20061108172014.b4bcea17.akpm@osdl.org> References: <1163034102.15681.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1163034102.15681.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Rusty Russell Cc: Chris Wright , Andi Kleen , virtualization List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 12:01:42 +1100 Rusty Russell wrote: > OK, at least two patches got dropped on the way from the mm tree to > Andi's tree: the desc.h cleanup, and the processor.h rearrangement. > Merging into Andi's tree without these patches must have been a > nightmare 8( > = > Andi then tried to fix it with x86_64-mm-paravirt-compile.patch but then > it didn't boot so he disabled it in x86_64-mm-paravirt-broken.patch = > = > This patch undoes those two patches and rearranges processor.h correctly > so the kernel compiles and boots with CONFIG_PARAVIRT. Andi's > "paravirt-compile" patch also cleans up the spinlock header, which is > good but should probably be patched separately. Fun. Andi, I have a mountain of fixes against your tree. Whatever you do, don't change anything! I'll get it all sent over later today.