From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH] speedstep-centrino should ignore upper performance control bits Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 19:22:08 -0500 Message-ID: <20061109002208.GA805@redhat.com> References: <20061106233923.GA15063@us.ibm.com> <20061107021441.GA10457@isilmar.linta.de> <200611070209.39817.len.brown@intel.com> <20061107184902.GA11620@us.ibm.com> <20061108232119.GB28012@us.ibm.com> <20061108232955.GL3309@redhat.com> <20061109000031.GD28012@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061109000031.GD28012@us.ibm.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Gary Hade Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, Dominik Brodowski On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 04:00:31PM -0800, Gary Hade wrote: > > Argh. I sat on the fence on this one until the dest settled, > > and now, as soon as I merge it, this happens. Bah! > Dave, I'm sorry. I just discovered the problem. :( Ok, I just tried to reconstruct my git tree without that diff and hit problems trying to get the older patches applying against a current tree, so I don't want to go down the route of making everyone rediff and resend the 20 or so patches already queued. However.. > > Send an incremental against cpufreq.git so I don't have to > > reconstruct the whole git tree? > Okay, I'll try to figure out how to do that. git revert has nuked the change, but leaves a mess in the commits, but I think we can live with that. So just send the right fix, and we'll make like this never happened :-) Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk