All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
To: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@thebarn.com>
Cc: "Igor A. Valcov" <viaprog@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS filesystem performance drop in kernels 2.6.16+
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:10:18 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061110011018.GP8394166@melbourne.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1163095715.5632.102.camel@xenon.msp.redhat.com>

On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 12:08:35PM -0600, Russell Cattelan wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 20:30 +0300, Igor A. Valcov wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > For one of our projects we have a test program that measures file
> > system performance by writing up to 1000 files simultaneously. After
> > installing kernel v2.6.16 we noticed that XFS performance dropped by a
> > factor of 5 (tests that took around 4 minutes on kernel 2.6.15 now
> > take around 20 minutes to complete). We then checked all kernels
> > starting from 2.6.16 up to 2.6.19-rc5 with the same unpleasant result.
> > The funny thing about all this is that we chose XFS for that
> > particular project specifically because it was about 5 times faster
> > with the tests than the other file systems. Now they all take about
> > the same time.
> > 
> > I also noticed that I/O barriers were introduced in v2.6.16 and
> > thought they may be the cause, but mounting the file system with
> > 'nobarrier' doesn't seem to affect the performance in any way.
> > 
> > Any thoughts on the matter are appreciated.
> I would try verifying the problem on a non ide disk just
> to confirm the write barrier theory.
> 
> Also file a bug.
> http://oss/sgi.com/bugzilla
> include test case and hard description if possible.

and cc xfs@oss.sgi.com on XFS bug reports ;)

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group

  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-10  1:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-09 17:30 XFS filesystem performance drop in kernels 2.6.16+ Igor A. Valcov
2006-11-09 17:44 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-11-09 18:08 ` Russell Cattelan
2006-11-10  1:10   ` David Chinner [this message]
2006-11-14 17:32     ` No Mails Shailendra Tripathi
2006-11-14 20:10       ` Eric Sandeen
2006-11-14 20:44       ` Russell Cattelan
2006-11-10  3:36 ` XFS filesystem performance drop in kernels 2.6.16+ Eric Sandeen
2006-11-10 11:59   ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-11-10 13:16     ` Igor A. Valcov
2006-11-10 14:44       ` Igor A. Valcov
2006-11-10 17:14       ` Eric Sandeen
2006-11-11  6:52       ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-11 10:55         ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-11-13 20:05 ` Tom Vier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061110011018.GP8394166@melbourne.sgi.com \
    --to=dgc@sgi.com \
    --cc=cattelan@thebarn.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viaprog@gmail.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.