All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
To: eli@dev.mellanox.co.il
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UDP packets loss
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:35:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061114143531.2ee7eae0@freekitty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60157.89.139.64.58.1163542547.squirrel@dev.mellanox.co.il>

On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:15:47 +0200 (IST)
eli@dev.mellanox.co.il wrote:

> Hi,
> I am running a client/server test app over IPOIB in which the client sends
> a certain amount of data to the server. When the transmittion ends, the
> server prints the bandwidth and how much data it received. I can see that
> the server reports it received about 60% that the client sent. However,
> when I look at the server's interface counters before and after the
> transmittion, I see that it actually received all the data that the client
> sent. This leads me to suspect that the networking layer somehow dropped
> some of the data. One thing to not - the CPU is 100% busy at the receiver.
> Could this be the reason (the machine I am using is 2 dual cores - 4
> CPUs).

If receiver application can't keep up UDP drops packets. The counter
receive buffer errors (UDP_MIB_RCVBUFERRORS) is incremented.

Don't expect flow control or reliable delivery; it's a datagram service!

> The secod question is how do I make the interrupts be srviced by all CPUs?
> I tried through the procfs as described by IRQ-affinity.txt but I can set
> the mask to 0F bu then I read back and see it is indeed 0f but after a few
> seconds I see it back to 02 (which means only CPU1).

Most likely, the user level irq balance daemon (irqbalanced) is adjusting it?

> 
> One more thing - the device I am using is capable of generating MSIX
> interrupts.
> 

Look at device capabilities with:

	lspci -vv


-- 
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-14 22:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-14 22:15 UDP packets loss eli
2006-11-14 22:35 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2006-11-14 23:08   ` eli
2006-11-14 23:23     ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-11-15 13:03     ` Neil Horman
2006-11-14 23:14   ` Auke Kok
2006-11-15 21:57     ` John Heffner
2006-11-14 22:54 ` Richard B. Johnson
     [not found] <60157.89.139.64.58.1163542548.squirrel@dev.mellanox.co.il>
2006-11-16 18:51 ` eli
2006-11-16 19:01   ` John Heffner
2006-11-16 21:10     ` eli
2006-11-16 21:23       ` David Miller
2006-11-16 23:52   ` Alan
2006-11-17 14:48   ` Neil Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061114143531.2ee7eae0@freekitty \
    --to=shemminger@osdl.org \
    --cc=eli@dev.mellanox.co.il \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.