From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Reloc Kernel List <fastboot@lists.osdl.org>,
ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@osdl.org, ak@suse.de, hpa@zytor.com,
magnus.damm@gmail.com, lwang@redhat.com, dzickus@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 10/16] x86_64: 64bit PIC ACPI wakeup
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 18:17:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061114231742.GE7030@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061114163002.GB4445@ucw.cz>
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 04:30:03PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > - Killed lots of dead code
> > - Improve the cpu sanity checks to verify long mode
> > is enabled when we wake up.
> > - Removed the need for modifying any existing kernel page table.
> > - Moved wakeup_level4_pgt into the wakeup routine so we can
> > run the kernel above 4G.
> > - Increased the size of the wakeup routine to 8K.
> > - Renamed the variables to use the 64bit register names.
> > - Lots of misc cleanups to match trampoline.S
> >
> > I don't have a configuration I can test this but it compiles cleanly
>
> Ugh, now that's a big patch.. and untested, too :-(.
>
> Why is PGE no longer required, for example?
>
> Can we get it piece-by-piece?
>
> > Vivek has tested this patch for suspend to memory and it works fine.
>
> Ok, so it was tested on one config. Given that the patch deals with
> detecting CPU oddities... :-(
Hi Pavel,
This code has been lying in RHEL kernels for close to 3 months now.
Have not heard of suspend/resume complaints. So hoping it got
tested on wide variety of hardware too apart from testing on my machine.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-14 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-13 16:21 [RFC] [PATCH 0/16] x86_64: Relocatable bzImage Support (V2) Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:26 ` [RFC] [PATCH 1/16] x86_64: Align data segment to page size boundary Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:28 ` [RFC] [PATCH 2/16] x86_64: Assembly safe page.h and pgtable.h Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 17:17 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-13 19:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-13 21:16 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-14 1:46 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-14 2:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-13 16:30 ` [RFC] [PATCH 3/16] x86_64: Kill temp_boot_pmds Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:31 ` [RFC] [PATCH 4/16] x86_64: Clean up the early boot page table Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:33 ` [RFC] [PATCH 5/16] x86_64: Fix earlyprintk to use standard ISA mapping Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:34 ` [RFC] [PATCH 6/16] x86_64: Modify copy_bootdata to to use virtual address Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:35 ` [RFC] [PATCH 7/16] x86_64: cleanup segments Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:40 ` [RFC] [PATCH 8/16] x86_64: Add EFER to the set registers saved by save_processor_state Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:42 ` [RFC] [PATCH 9/16] x86_64: 64bit PIC SMP trampoline Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 17:28 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-13 16:43 ` [RFC] [PATCH 10/16] x86_64: 64bit PIC ACPI wakeup Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 17:22 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-13 17:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 18:13 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-13 19:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-13 19:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 19:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-13 23:01 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-13 23:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-15 21:07 ` [PATCH] x86_64: Move cpu long mode verification code to common file (was Re: [RFC] [PATCH 10/16] x86_64: 64bit PIC ACPI wakeup) Vivek Goyal
2006-11-15 22:54 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-16 20:06 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-14 16:30 ` [RFC] [PATCH 10/16] x86_64: 64bit PIC ACPI wakeup Pavel Machek
2006-11-14 21:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-14 21:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-11-14 23:43 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-15 3:49 ` Andi Kleen
2006-11-15 17:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-15 18:29 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-15 18:38 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-14 23:17 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2006-11-14 23:39 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-15 21:24 ` [Fastboot] " Vivek Goyal
2006-11-15 23:03 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-16 0:28 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-16 20:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-16 20:53 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-16 21:29 ` Vivek Goyal
2006-11-16 21:51 ` Pavel Machek
2006-11-13 16:44 ` [RFC] [PATCH 11/16] x86_64: Modify discover_ebda to use virtual address Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:46 ` [RFC] [PATCH 12/16] x86_64: Remove the identity mapping as early as possible Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:47 ` [RFC] [PATCH 13/16] x86_64: __pa and __pa_symbol address space separation Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:48 ` [RFC] [PATCH 14/16] x86_64: Remove CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:50 ` [RFC] [PATCH 15/16] x86_64: Relocatable kernel support Vivek Goyal
2006-11-13 16:51 ` [RFC] [PATCH 16/16] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061114231742.GE7030@in.ibm.com \
--to=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lwang@redhat.com \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.